User:Johns9ea/Ibibio people /Napor1me Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? -- Johns9ea
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: -- "User:Johns9ea/sandbox"

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? -- There is no lead in the sandbox.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? -- n/a
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? -- n/a
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? -- n/a
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? -- n/a

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? -- Yes the content added and the proposed content upgrade the quality of the article.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? -- There are some sources from the 21st century, which is very good concerning "up-to-date-ness." The other sources all come the later half of the 20th century, which is also quite good for research on African art.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? -- Most of the content proposed to be added is on masks. You've made several observations in "Preliminary Observations," do you plan on fleshing these areas out yourself for this project?

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? -- Content added is neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? -- No, all claims are unbiased and factual.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? -- No, there are not really any viewpoints to represent; everything is quite neutral.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? -- No, the writing is neutral and does not present a biased perspective.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? -- Yes, all information is backed up by sources.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? -- Yes, all of the literature is credible.
 * Are the sources current? -- There are some sources from the 21st century, which is very good concerning "up-to-date-ness." The other sources all come the later half of the 20th century, which is also quite good for research on African art.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? -- Yes, all links work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? -- Content is in the form of bullet points, but yes they are clear and easy to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? -- Grammar and spelling look good.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? -- Content proposed under masks are organized by towns, which is a clever way to do it.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? -- n/a
 * Are images well-captioned? -- n/a
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? -- n/a
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? -- n/a

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? -- Adding this information to the article will round the article out more.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? -- Biggest strength of the article is that you go very in-depth to specifics of masks by location. This brings a dimension to the African art page community.
 * How can the content added be improved? -- What other types of art and cultural information do you plan to add?