User:Johnwikster/Cylon of Athens/Marge584 Peer Review

Hello!

Lead Section

I feel like the added info you put into the lead section could be its own section. Especially since there are only two other sections to the article. It could be something like "History in Literature" where you can further explain the sources where we get Cylon. Maybe condense all of that into one summarizing sentence for the lead section.

Clarity of Article Structure

The order is organized, especially since there aren't many sections.

Coverage Balance

I think coverage balance would be better with the note I added about the lead section. Having one more section that talks about the sources of where Cylon is talked about could be its own section. I love the addition of the archaeological discoveries!

Content Neutrality

Content is very neutral!

Sources

Are there any new sources that you used? I can't really tell if the Notes or References are new. If so, you should probably put some into the bibliography when you finalize the project!

Also, is there a source for the map? If so, maybe make it a reference at the end of the caption sentence.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)