User:Johxan/sandbox

Between Wikipedia.com and another encyclopedia in this case classicalarchives.com, which one is more informative on the person Giuseppe Tartini on who he is and what he has done? They will be judged by the content of the article and by the sources used to get this information. First off, what Wikipedia has to offer on him is a Biography about him, Compositions by him, Theoretical Works he found and finally a Fictional portrayal in a book. Classicalarchives has a short history of him with important accomplishments included into the texts of the historical paragraphs. Between these two on what they know about him, Wikipedia is best. The reasoning is that Wikipedia has more information on what he has done like the compositions and the theorem he made. While classicalarchives has more of what he has been through than Wikipedia, but not as much detail on what he has done in life. Next is the sources used to get all their data. For Wikipedia they had 4 references and 10 external links while classicalarchives has some of its information from the external source All Music Guide. From this information Wikipedia has a broader view of Giuseppe. Thus Wikipedia is better in sources used to get the information. All in all Wikipedia has more to offer due to how diverse their categories are about him and how much. Additional sources that can be compared to either Wikipedia or other encyclopedias are http://www.algonquincollege.com/lrc/library/ www.britannica.com/ http://www.newadvent.org/ http://www.allmusic.com/ http://www.naxos.com/ http://www.classicalconnect.com/ http://www.8notes.com/ http://www.last.fm/ http://www.findagrave.com/ http://fifthsymphony.wordpress.com/ http://www.classicalarchives.com/ November 11 2012 http://wikipedia.org/ November 11 2012