User:Jojo0577/Agricultural chemistry/Mtanner27 Peer Review

General info
Jojo0577
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Jojo0577/Agricultural chemistry
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Agricultural chemistry

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead section does not have any updates made, however it is still a strong lead paragraph. The ideas of the article and main sections are identified in the lead section. The definition of the topic, Agricultural Chemistry, is defined in the first sentence of the lead paragraph. The lead is concise and gets straight to the point of what the rest of the article will be about.

The content added into this article is relevant to the topic. The content added is an expansion on content already in the article. I do not see any bias claims added into the article. I feel like the content added is appropriate to the topic and relevant for the article. There is no persuasion in the article to make the readers lean a way.

All information added has been cited by reliable secondary sources. The information added into the article is backed up by the sources that are cited. There is no plagiarism in this article. All links provided are good links, and work. All of the sources are recent and within the past 10 years.

The most important advice I give about the article is that the paragraphs are a little lengthy, which may cause people to glimpse at the article versus fully reading the content added. I feel like being more concise in the new content will allow the readers to fully understand the point made.