User:JonCole2/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)Pro Football Hall of Fame

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this topic because this subject has been a household conversation for me and my family on many occasions.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article overall is not terrible, although they do veer off topic often.

The articles strengths are the exact dates and locations.

Instead of placing the history of the Hall Of Fame into a section, it should have been included in the first few paragraphs.

It is not well-developed and should have spoken more about the sole purpose for the reason the hall of fame was created.

The article began to speak about the Canton bulldogs, which threw me off. Although they did fund the hall of fame, I didn't have to be informed they had the first repeat champion. I. eleven the article constantly brought up irrelevant things. Such as the Chicago bears etc.