User:Jonahx11!/sandbox

Article evaluation (2-8-19)

'''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?'''

Yes, it relevant to what the article title is about an no there is not anything distracting me when I read it.

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?'''

Everything seems to be updated but one thing that the article is missing is that they could have be more importation.

What else could be improved?

What they could have improved on is the length of the article because its not long enough but its good overall and has a lot to work on.

'''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?'''

Everything when I read this seems natural and No there isn’t anything bias about this article

'''Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?'''

Yes all the links do work an they do support their claims too.

'''Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?'''

I would say that there all reliable.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?

In this article the conversations would come up to what an how does politics have to do with school and how do they effect students going forward