User:Jondel/RFCRickk

I see Rickk on the same side on many of the voting forums and seems like a good administrator. I am however disappointed with his behaviour in the Waking the Tiger deletion issue. So if you lose a VfD vote, all you have to do is rename the article, strip off the VfD headers, and get a new chance with new votes? RickK 05:53, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Trollish behaviour
 * Misinterpreting /misrepresenting me as a schemer:


 * I'm trying to manipulate anybody, the book can be life transforming for some people!!

The reason I'm so intent on deletion is because you're trying to make an end run around the VfD process by changing the name and stripping off the VfD header. This article was clearly voted for deletion, and your manipulations are inappropriate. RickK 05:06, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Assumes the worst in people:

I AM NOT MANIPULATING, I informed the administrators before acting based on suggestions of the supporters at the Vfd page!!!

'The same nonsense that was in the first article is in this one. The whole Medusa business. This is almost word-for-word from the first article. Whether or not this is a book review, the same wording applies. RickK 21:05, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Disregard of deletion /undeletion policy.
 * I find this very rude!!:


 * Nonsense huh?!!! What does it take to convince that healing trauma is not nonsense? A traumatic experience? As of this writing, THERE ARE 10 KEEP VOTES. Only 1 abstain, NO DELETE VOTES and a lot of frustations that I had to go through to get an article which I already knew should be notable. Why do I have to go through this?!!


 * Inconsistent, violates his own rules:

Why can't it just be speedied as re-creation of deleted material? Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:23, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC) I would love to. RickK 21:05, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)


 * And goes right ahead with what he loves to and unilaterally deletes it the article anyway. Deserves the oscar for pretending to be sincere.--Jondel 04:08, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Uses my very own words to misrepresent me or twist things around:

The diff doesn't work. But please note that even Jondel him/herself, in the edit summary, said Removed redirect, added and copied contents from How to heal traumas. So Jondel acknoweldged that the information in the article was copied from the VfD'd article. This was a violation of consensus, a violation of the VfD process, and not acting in good faith because Jondel has claimed all along that the information was different when even his/her own edit summary says otherwise. RickK 06:31, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)

RICK PLEASE DO NOT TWIST THINGS AROUND!!!!

Rick, if you are going to continue being and administrator, ask yourself why people do things, then make your judgement.


 * Stubborn in a an unproductive way. Despite the fact that How to Heal Traumas and Waking the Tiger have very different contents, he insists on deleting Waking the Tiger as a recreation of How to Heal Traumas.