User:JonesAndRusty/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
The Magnus Archives

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
We could choose anything and I was listening to this earlier this morning.

Evaluate the article

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Nothing distractd me and for as far as I have listened, everything is relevent to the subject matter.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * I didnt find anything that was missing and I beleive everything is up to date.
 * Can you identify any notable equity gaps? Does the article underrepresent or misrepresent historically marginalized populations?
 * I cant find any gaps.
 * What else could be improved?
 * I don't know. It seems like a pretty well trafficed and edited page.


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * It read as pretty neutral and I didnt see anything that was biased.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Not really, as the only "overrepresented" viewpoint I saw was that of the main character.


 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The links work and the ones I went through do have information to support the claims made within the article.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * As far as I can tell, everything is appropriately cited and referenced, with most of the information coming from the source material or q and a's with the creator.
 * Do the sources come from a diverse array of authors and publications?
 * Not really, as most of the sources are from the source material or the creator.


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There isnt a lot of conversation within the talk page but there is a lot written. What I think is the original person to work on the article recomened a collaboration of the month proposal.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * It is part of four wikiprojects and I cant find what its rated.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * In class we have focused on a lot of people pages and this is a page about a peice of media, which I think is the biggest difference to what we have been doing in class. Even though it is a sizable article, it doesnt have a lot of edits.