User:Jordanm12/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
John C. Boothroyd

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article to evaluate because it is similar to the article that I will be creating. By evaluating an article on another research scientist, I will hopefully gain better insight on how to plan and create my own article. My preliminary impression of this article is that it does not include much detail.

Evaluate the article
The lead section gives a good overview of the topic and tells the reader why this person is important and notable. It is concise, includes a description of the articles major sections, and does not include any information that isn't present in the main article. While overall the content of this article is sparse and lacks some detail, the information appears to be relevant and up to date. Some information may be missing, but this is likely due to a lack of sources on this topic. The tone of this article remains neutral throughout, and no claims appear to be biased. While there are not many sources for this article, the sources that are present appear to be reliable and current. More sources on John Boothroyd's research or publications could probably be included. The article would be improved if a new section was added that discussed research and publications. No images were included, so adding this might improve the quality and interest of the article as well. This article was written as part of two WikiProjects, WikiProject Biography and WikiProject Microbiology. Currently there is no discussion on the Talk page. Overall, this article seems to be a good representation of the available information on this topic. It is well-written and concise, thought not very detailed.