User:Jordannstone/Aeolidia papillosa/ChristianHicks7 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info
Jordannstone

Aeolidia papillosa

Lead
The lead has a proper introductory sentence that presents the topic being discussed however is not complete.

Content
All content is relevant and up to date with current information. Some information is missing, more sections and more information in current sections is needed. Overall, existing content is well formatted and appropriate.

Tone and Balance
Content is neutral and no bias is present.

Sources and References
Resources are reliable and come from academic biology journals. Sources are current. The links to sources work.

Organization
Content is well-written. No noticable spelling or grammatical errors. Sections are well organized.

Images and Media
Images enhance the article and are well captioned.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

The article meets Wikipedia's Notability requirements. More resources will be needed to complete the article. It does link to other articles.

Overall impressions
The strengths of the article is how well organized and easy to understand it is. It could improved with more sections and information from different resources being added.

Overall evaluation
Over all the article was well written despite needing further work.