User:Jordansanicharan/Audio mixing (recorded music)/Stannous98 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jordansanicharan


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Audio Mixing - Jordan's draft


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Audio Mixing

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Yes. The lead only mentions the strategic placement of sound altering materials
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * It is concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * No

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Not necessarily. The content is heavily based on the materials used depending on the size of the room.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No. The content is informative.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
 * Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * One of them are. The rest are books from 2011-present
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Yes there is a diverse spectrum of authors although not historically marginalized individuals.
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
 * No. The sources used contain concrete data/
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * The content is concise, clear and easy to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Minor spelling errors
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * The content is broken down in paragraph form. There are no heading to separate the content.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * The picture provided exemplifies one type of room acoustic material.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Yes. The caption describes the image well.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * The image was personally taken and uploaded by the author.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * The image is laid out in a visually acknowledging way.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * The content has definitely filled a content gap that seems necessary to add towards the original article.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * It has taught me the importance of room space and the necessary audio proofing materials required to achieve the ideal
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * I would suggest to elaborate your lead. I also suggest to include a brief description of the article's major sections within your lead. The body had good content, just separate the text with headings.