User:Jordneu03/Social judgment theory/SQ12 Peer Review

General info
Jordneu03
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Jordneu03/Social judgment theory
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Social judgment theory

Evaluate the drafted changes
I've read and reviewed the article on "Social Judgment Theory" by Jordneuo3. The article consists of an article draft with a missing lead, however, it does have a very well-done article body. In the body of the draft, I do find a handful of needed grammatical error checks and a lack of flow from one sentence to another. I would encourage them to be bridged in a manner of clarity and flow. The body explains briefly and not very detailed version of what social judgment theory is, but it does have some great key points:

"SJT is the way opinions and thoughts are formed on specific issues or beliefs."

"It is able to explain the reasoning behind why and how people have different reactions and responses towards information or any specific issue."

The two key points are very valid, and great, however, including an example of those key points would strengthen the engagement and understanding of those reading the article.

The three factors included at the end of the draft, I was able to clearly understand and comprehend. I do think it overall has great information that could be of great benefit to be added to the article. I would say to go back and make the draft sound more grammatically formal and elaborate since compared to the article it does seem to be lacking in that aspect.