User:JosebaAbaitua/sandbox/References/DHum1920/RAMÍREZ VÁSQUEZ, María de los Ángeles

User:JosebaAbaitua/sandbox/References

Gelman, A & Loken, E. (2013) Stated "We regret the spread of the terms “fishing” and “p-hacking” (and even “researcher degrees of freedom”) for two reasons: first, because when such terms are used to describe a study, there is the misleading implication that researchers were consciously trying out many different analyses on a single data set". In The garden of forking paths

Cohen, J. (1992) stated "One possible reason for the continued neglect of statistical power analysis in research in the behavioral sciences is the inaccessibility of or difficulty with the standard material". In A power primer. Psychological Bulletin.

Gelman, A. & Stern, H. (2006) stated " It is common to summarize statistical comparisons by declara- tions of statistical significance or nonsignificance". In The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant.

Orben, A. & Przybylski A. K. (2019) stated "The widespread use of digital technologies by young people has spurred speculation that their regular use negatively impacts psychological well-being". In The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use. Nature Human Behaviour


 * Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (2013). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Department of Statistics, Columbia University.
 * Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155.
 * Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328-331.
 * Orben, A., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019). The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(2), 173.