User:Joseph142003/Istiblennius zebra/Gr3gagustin Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Since there is only one paragraph available for the entire page I think using a lead with brief descriptions of major sections will definitely help organize the material in this article.

The content is also lacking beyond the description provided of the species, so I think finding a few more references would boost the information available to be added into the improvement of the article.

'''The picture provided is also a bit hard to see since it is a painting. There is not a clear view of the details of how the species looks, perhaps acquiring a different picture would help.'''

Overall impression of the article is that it starts off really well with detailed information and I like having found all the different names that this fish is known for, although organization could use a bit of work because it is all condensed into one paragraph, regardless I think it is a great starting point.