User:Joseph Rivero/Knowledge society/Melanie.riveracolón Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Joseph Rivero
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Joseph Rivero/Knowledge society

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
''The lead paragraph is good, detailed but concise, and it summarizes the whole article. I compared it with the actual Wikipedia article and the student add some interesting facts about the topic. For me, this part of the article is complete and does not need any more changes. However, I do know that since the draft article is in process, maybe the student will make some changes, which is also good.''

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Content evaluation
''The sections that are in the article are interesting, well explained and complete. At first, I thought that it would be a good idea to added a section about society knowledge in economy; however, there is a section in the article called "Social Theory" and it has a basis of information about this particular topic (economy). If the student is interested and wants to add this economy section, he can do it.''

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
''This article is not biased toward a particular position, is neutral and has good facts of information. That being said, the student is doing a great job with the draft; it is not persuasive at all, it is informative.''

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
''I clicked on a few links and it worked; however, when I went to the references at the bottom of the article, I could not click links on some of them. The ones that I could click were good sources of information.''

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
''The article is organized and well written. Nevertheless, when I was reading the first sentence of the lead paragraph, I needed to re-read it to understand it better. I think it would be great if the student paraphrases that sentence in another way. Other than that, I did not find any gramatical or spelling errors.''

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
There are no images in the draft for the moment, but since there is time left until the due date, it is okay.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
''I know that the draft is not finished, but the student is doing a great job giving us readers a great article about this topic and showing effort by adding more important information and improving it, specially the lead article. The topic is interesting, the article is clear, detailed and informative.''

To the student: Keep going, do not stop improving and good job!