User:Josephsephio/Sex trafficking in Mexico/Cmarajoyses 03 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Josephsephio


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Sex trafficking in Mexico
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

·       Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?: Article's major sections has too little information. You would need to add more information regarding that section. However, if you are still working on it, please add a note that you are still currently improving this section.

·       Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?: Yes, there is an introductory sentence that describes the topic, however, there are too much information in just the introductory paragraph.

Content:

·       Is the content added relevant to the topic?: Yes, so far the contents on your wikipedia is relevant to the topic. I suggest that maybe add a little bit more information and focus more on a topic or an issue.

·       Is the content added up-to-date?: Yes, so far your references don't go below year 2015

·       Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?: You are missing some informations from your headings. For instance, from the "Mexican Drug War" maybe expand more on that area as well as the next one "Non-governmental Organization" maybe you can add a little bit of introduction as what they are and how they are related to sex trafficking in Mexico.

·       '''Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?:''' I feel like this topic about sex trafficking is underrepresented, I feel like it's not talked about as it should be because it's a serious topic that needs to at least be discussed.

Tone and Balance[edit]

·       Is the content added neutral?: so far, the content is neutral.

·       Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?: It is neither overrepresented nor underrepresented. But maybe dig deeper on the topic itself provide evidence to your claims.

·       Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?: No, not really. I feel like it is just discussing the topic and showing the reality of sex trafficking in Mexico.

Sources and References[edit]

·       Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?: Yes, the information provided are backed up with secondary sources.

·       '''Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.):''' There are some that are accurately reflected on what the cited sources say. Maybe add more topics such as how people are trying to end trafficking. Read through one of your sources that talks about this area.

·       Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?: I believe that you have reliable sources. You just need to dig deeper and actually use your sources. You can create different heading and topics that still relates to your main topic and use it as an evidence to your claims.

·       Are the sources current?: Yes the sources are current.

·       '''Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?:''' The sources provided are from a wide variety of organizations, new, and articles.

·       '''Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.):''' Maybe research more on news articles such as the abcnews articles, nbc news etc.

·       '''Check a few links. Do they work?:''' Yes because it really discusses what is happening and the events that occurs.

Organization[edit]

·       Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?: I feel that in your introduction area. You put too much information that could be a bigger topic on your content because they are relevant to tour topic and you can add more information.

·       Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No, so far the content is free of grammar and spelling.

·       Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?: I believe that you need to work on your organization more. Break down topics such as maybe add statistics regarding the sex trafficking.

For New Articles Only[edit]

·       Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes, there is enough sources to meet the Wikipedia’s notability requirement.

·       '''How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?:''' I feel like there is too many sources to support very little information that is written about the topic.

·       Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?: The article contains infoboxes, and links that may be related to the subject. However, there are too little information on section heading and maybe ad one or two more headings.

·       Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?: Yes, the article links to other articles.

Overall impressions[edit]

·       Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?: I believe it still missing some information, and need to expand more on topics that are on the headings.

·    What are the strengths of the content added?: You really have a strong set of sources that can be added to your article.