User:Josh Hwang/Key Peninsula/CassieClovis02 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Josh Hwang


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Josh Hwang/Key Peninsula


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Key Peninsula

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hi Josh!

Lead:

Overall I think that the article's lead is good and concise. I like how the location is mentioned to give the reader a good sense of where the Key Peninsula is. I do think that some more information could be added in this section such as a brief overview of the different sections located throughout the article. You may also consider adding a little more background information on the Key Peninsula.

Content:

The content of the article is knowledgable, but I do think that more content is needed. For example, content needs to be added under the hydrology section that is currently blank. I think that you could also add a few more sections such as the history relating to the Key Peninsula. Overall, I do think that the current article content is relevant and up to date.

Tone and Balance:

The tone and balance throughout the article are good. I didn't find any areas of bias or persuasion in this article. The only recommendation I have here is to add more substance to the article overall.

Sources and References:

I do think that the sources used are reliable and current. However, I do think that only having two sources is insufficient. I would try to find some more scholarly sources that you could use to increase the validity of the article and also to add more content.

Organization:

Like I said above in regards to content, I do think that adding a few more sections to this article along with content will improve and strengthen the article overall. A history section could be useful as well as a breakdown of the current population and economy of the Key Peninsula. I would also talk more about uses of the Key Peninsula, if there are any besides for housing, etc. The organization is good, it just needs cleaned up a bit.

Images and Media:

I did see that you removed the image that was originally in the Key Peninsula article. I was not sure if this was by mistake or if this was intentionally done. I think that the image gives readers a good mental picture of the Key Peninsula and that it can help them better connect with what they are reading. Not having images makes it more difficult to interpret and understand what is being said about location throughout the article. Whether you want to add that image back in or put in a new one, I think that having images such as a map along the Key Peninsula and an image of one of the schools mentioned will really benefit the article.

Overall Impressions:

Overall, I really enjoyed reading and evaluating this article. I would take some time to look up more sources and add content, as well as to organize some of the current sections in the article. Other than that, the content that is currently in the article is great!