User:JoshuaRustia/sandbox

Good evaluation Josh.

More details would help the answer for this question: Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

-There is a lack of representation for criticisms and controversy more specifically relating to food applications, and regulations.

What do you mean by, There are a long list of them that have not been checked."

Article evaluation: "Pascalization"

''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?''

-The article was heavy on the "History". I would prefer a more information about the pros and cons as well as the section "Consumer acceptance of Pascalization" needs a lot of work and should almost not be posted there.

''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?''

-The article does include "Criticisms" but the section isn't strong or heavily detailed. It just details an experiment. This can definitely be a target for improvement.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

-There is a lack of representation for criticisms and controversy more specifically relating to food applications, and regulations.

''Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?''

-The links do work. There are a long list of them that have not been checked.

-Most of the information is correctly cited, but I did note that in the references, a lot of the citations come from the same source. (Hendrickx & Knorr 2002) which is also a little outdated.

-I am confused about some of the citations. They link to a website, https://savse.com/our-story/ which is a site for company with juices and smoothies.

''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?''

-(Hendrickx & Knorr 2002) and some other sources that could be update. There are some all the way back from 1999.

-Can update the applications of HPP and definitely the list of controversies regulations and where it is used today. Again can also add a more clear Pros/Cons section.

-Would like to have a more organized list of products actually using HPP commercially.

''Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?''

-HPP foods available in the UK was added as well as previous talks about High pressure food preservation.

-This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink/WikiProject Microbiology.

-It is a Low-priorety

-Stated as a "Start-Class"article

How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

-Again the article is heavy on history. There can definitely be work done about adding more information on the process of HPP, Regulations, and add a section for Equipment used. I would love to see more numbers about reduction of microbes and different processing times. They can also improve on organizing the processing section.