User:Joshuamenard95/Gali-Dana Singer/Elibishun Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Joshuamenard95
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Joshuamenard95/Gali-Dana Singer

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? The information here right now is quite comprehensive and summarizes many of the most necessary aspects of Singer's biography. Consider (if the information is available) talking about things like how Singer has been recognized or their impact / public reception?

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? N/A
 * Are the sources current? N/A
 * Check a few links. Do they work? N/A

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Minor, such as a needed space in 'St. Petersburg'.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? No; consider breaking your content into appropriate sections (such as the main section, where the name Gali-Dana Singer should be bolded, a section for Life and Career, etc.)

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No
 * Are images well-captioned? N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? N/A

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? No
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? The list of sources is currently not listed.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary info boxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? No, see the above section on Organization for feedback on this.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? No, consider linking terms (such as locations, bodies of work, etc.) by pasting the URL in the sandbox (this will automatically create a hyperlink with the title of the page as the word).

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The writing style was very clear; I feel like I know who Singer is and why they are important.
 * How can the content added be improved? Along with some of the suggestions above, a good 'template' to try and emulate is another Wikipedia page of an author/poet/artist. Looking at another published page may give you ideas for how you'd like to organize your entry.