User:Josiebruin/Rosy Cortez/20Monica02 Peer Review

General info
Josiebruin and Drelovee
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Josiebruin/Rosy_Cortez?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

Lead is brief and concise. Not sure but I think the professor preferred the format for birth year in name (year born). Also be sure to add a citation to every sentence, the last one is missing one.

Content

Good overview on early life and education, easy to follow. It may be helpful to also add descriptions to the art (medium, brief visual description).

Tone/Balance

Neutral and concise

Sources

Good sources

OrganizationMay need to reorganize the references since it seems like it is doubled. Additionally adding headers feature to separate the sections would be helpful. I looked at Alma Lopez wiki article for reference to format

Impression

Great work, just needs some final touches and ready to submit !