User:JouBurkeC/Magazine St./MyersJam Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

JouBurkeC


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:JouBurkeC/Magazine St.


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Magazine Street

Evaluate the drafted changes
I believe the lead section is pretty informational. It is updated and covers the sections that are present in the article. The content is good and stays on topic. The content is neutral and factual. The only thing that I would say about your sources, is that you have the same one twice. I believe your article is very detailed and you are heading in the right direction.