User:JouBurkeC/Magazine Street/Inspiration 2.0 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Username: JouBurkeC/Magazine Street


 * User:JouBurkeC/Magazine Street
 * Magazine Street  (Link to the current version of the article)
 * Magazine Street  (Link to the current version of the article)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead section of your article is good. You talk about all the topics that you included in your lead section except for one, restaurants. You add maybe a section about the restaurants on Magazine Street or you can probably add it to your Description section. As for the content of your article, it is really good. I like how it is organized and how everything kind of flows together. I do think that if you can, you can add more information to your Description Section, For example, I noticed that you talked about the neighborhoods that Magazine Street is composed of, but you did not include like a small description of those neighborhoods. I think that you should include at least a sentence or two about those neighborhoods. Also, for your Demographics Section, I think you should add in there why it is very high and requires high maintenance to stay on Magazine street. Another thing is your reference section, all your sources are good and they work of course, I was just wondering why you have two of the all the sources you used. Like at the bottom you put the link to the websites, hut you already have those referenced. You do not need to have those down there since they are already cited and you can get to your sources by simply clicking on the ones that have the 1, 2, and 3 by them. Other than all that, your article is pretty good.