User:JouBurkeC/Magazine Street/Mariocartlover Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:JouBurkeC


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:JouBurkeC/Magazine Street
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Magazine Street

Evaluate the drafted changes
I like you lead! It's very strong and concise. I like that content and I think it's up-to-date and I like how you included demographics because I don't think the original article does that. Your tone is neutral and I like how your viewpoint is also neutral. So for your sources, all the links work, but the last three are the same as the first 3, so maybe just delete the repeated links. From what I can tell, your sources all come from good and reliable sources. You organization is good, but maybe you cold add another category about the attractions on magazine, since that's what it's know for. The image about district donuts is great and maybe you could include district donut in your subcategory of attractions (if you want to).

Overall impression: I think your article is good. Your tone, lead, organization, media is good. Only thing I have to add is the making the "attractions" category, but overall your article is nicely done!