User:Jovanna.moya/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=126_Artist-run_Gallery&oldid=1192628391

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
While it doesn't directly relate to the course, I believe a big part of art history is also what we do in the present and how we share art with he world, so it can someday become history.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)


 * The lead is concise and gives a clear explanation of what the article is about.
 * Lead does not give any additional information about the article.
 * Article content is relevant to what is expected from the lead.
 * The content is not up-to-date. The last we know of the gallery is from 2009.
 * Content seems to deal with the equity gap as art is underrepresented.
 * Tone and balance seem to be clear and neutral, not attempting to sway the reader in any direction or perspective on the topic.
 * Sources are fair. I am confused as to why some are more current (2020), but the article itself hasn't been updated with any news past 2009.
 * The organization and writing quality are well done.
 * The images and media are well chosen and placed within the article. They immediately grabbed my attention.
 * The talk page was last active on 11/22/20. The commenter made a suggestion for the original author to add in the lead, where the gallery is currently located (as it has moved around many times)