User:Joycellyy/White Lake Grasslands Protected Area/Emderman Peer Review

I like the use of tables for the species in the area, a very smart way to summarize a large chunk of information. The article is pretty clear on what it's saying, maybe a few tweaks are needed. The tone of the writing is neural and professional, fitting with the Wikipedia guide lines. The article includes Indigenous peoples point of view, addressing neglected viewpoints. The sources look good, all of them work and fit the guidelines. Everything includes a source. There's no gaps in knowledge which is great. The article meets seven of the needed topics. Looks good!

The first paragraph could use some more information, maybe add the "Climate" section or bits of it to the paragraph.

The first paragraph of the article is a little confusing with "The first aim is...". Maybe adding "The first aim to protect the land/area" or something like that would help. This could even have it's own section or be adding to another section of the article to make it flow better.

I think reordering the sections to make it so that the most important ones are higher up, like the "Climate" section, would help the article.

The article is well balanced, although some stuff is repeated in the "Ecology" and "Conservation" sections.

The article meets these topics:

• Information about what species can be found in the protected area (plants, animals, other species)

• Identification of any species at risk in the protected area, and information about their population trends, if available

• Description of the issues/goals that led to the creation of the protected area

• Information about First Nations whose traditional and ancestral territory/ies are included in the protected area

• Whether First Nations were included in the process creating the protected area, or whether they supported the creation of the protected area

• Whether First Nations are currently included in management decisionmaking processes for the protected area, and either way, what their priorities are for the management of and access to the area

• Historical use of the now-protected area: what resources were harvested or extracted there (biological resources like fish, animals, plants, or timber; physical resources like rock or oil), how much, when, and by who? How did this affect the formation of the protected area?