User:Joyous!/Talk archive 12

Stathamism
I was simply wondering why the article on Stathamism is was deleted, I would have gladly changed it but it is true. His cult following is more than simply existent I did not just make that up, and the doctrine (not religion) of Stathamism is followed by numerous people. I didn't mean to vandalize or throw mish-mash on there, in fact it was totally serious (even though I do acknowledge that some of positions of Stathamists such as Bishop of Pain, are ridiculous they do exist. So I know you do not have much time but could you perhaps elaborate as to why the content I added was deleted. It was just as real as the other content I have added that was not deleted. Thankyou, and hopefully I can work this out, if not then, so be it. EDIT: THANKS

cloudveil
Pitonpro 15:59, 31 December 2006 (UTC) you have deleted content I created for no valid reason. I have mirrored existing companies in profiling Cloudveil on the Wiki. Please explain in detail why you have ignored previous content as examples and deleted what I have added to the wiki. And please explain to me how I am a spammer. Clearly you have different ideas about what should be included in the wiki, but based on existing content I have no violated any rules. I would like to have the page titled cloudveil re-established. I did edit it a second time and this time I get no warning...Now I wonder who else can I contact to complain about this agressive editying and deleting that you have been doing to content I am creating....

Thanks for nothing!

Nerd pride day
As an embassor of the nerd counterculture, I am deeply sorry that you have send my article to deletion. I assume that you did what you had to do, as you thought that as a joke, or irrevelant. Nevertheless, this holiday is a fact. Even though I admit that my article is not a really good one, the article in the Spanish wikipedia already existed (although I do not know how to create the link from one wikipedia to the other) as "Día del Orgullo Friki". I hope that other people will help me to improve it if it is not deleted. We are trying to help this day being calebrated all around the globe. I ask you not to send it to deletion again, as I have added some references to it which might help you and others verify it is not a joke. And if you have to, please let me know what to do to avoid it for the next time. Thank you anyway. LeChimp 10:21, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Unhappy customers
Hey there, I don't really know how to respond to you... I hope this is the right way. You deleted my page claiming that my group is "non-notable". If you had taken a bit of time to research the group, you would see it that it is indeed notable, however you seem to have hit the delete button without giving it much consideration. The 5 years of existance, and the hundreds of members... Perhaps you should exercise some consideration before "policing" wikipedia. (article on Fastdubs, which you deleted within minutes of it being posted.) were did the the universe come from? If your answer to that was, "Well it all happend randomly." How,then did this randomness occur? What made it possible? Think that over.
 * Report it I have: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006_November_27#27_November_2006
 * May I ask you a really personal question? Why are you athiest? Hey, if you dont belive in God,
 * Joyous, why did you delete my page on Daniel Morcombe?
 * Hey dyke bag, who do you think you are? An atheist hey, well I bet you rot in hell with old liberal mcShitliberal herself Barbara Kingsolver.
 * Hey Declan Hunter is a close friend of mine NOT me,and he does merrit having his own page on wikipedia as he has started a charity helping people affected by epilepsy i was just witing on a press release before adding it to the page.
 * HEY, WHAT'S GOING ON MASN, WHY DID YOU DELTE THE ATRTICLE ON THE "BEARDO?!?!?! THAT'S AN IMPROTANT ARTICLE, YOU SHOULDN'T FUCK WIT ME, YO!!!  IF YOU DO IT AGIAN, ILL BEARDO YO WOMAN!  YA HEARD???  I GOT THEM NEEDLES IN MY CHIIIIIIIIN, YEEEE  —Preceding unsigned comment added by  Pookiekook (talk • contribs)
 * I hate you! i was just putting more information on in case the general public wanted to know but noooo you had to delete it and then mock me??? i will dedicate my life to making sure you do not live to see age 135. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by P verploegen (talk • contribs).


 * Why did you delete my part of the Snickers article? so what if it is not true? it is funny and some idiots will believe it.


 * As a matter of fact, they are right ! No offence, but i think Wikipedia has overestimated you and given you superior powers over moderation. Mis-using your powers, if i may say, is not very healthy. Please do not delete articles before reading it carefully and in an in-depth level.-TusharN

Massdisturbtion
I started a page about a local band called Massdisturbtion yesterday. I got a message this afternoon about it being under consideration for speedy deletion unless I explained why they are notable and the message told me to visit the general biography criteria, which I did, and when I went to change it, the page had already been deleted.

phelanism
recently you deleted a page i created about the local cult called phelanism. if it's because it's a bit poor, it's just that i could only start it on a mobile. if you give it a while, it should be sorted. thanks if you do and fair enough if you don't

User talk:202.89.36.170
No worries. -- Xinit 23:42, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Jed "Big Wiggly" Holmes
I find it frustrating that an article on a rising hip hop star is up for deletion. Jed "Big Wiggly" Holmes was featured in an hour long interview and live performance on WRFA-LP in Jamestown New York, on the Local Music Showcase Hour, while his content was highly edited, he still maintained his message on AIDS awareness. Due to his airtime, he meets the half hour radio qualification for an artist page.

The Religon of APTBCPPTBAPTBC
This is an actual group that has a numerous amount of members across the united states and you have failed to see that it is a subject worth having a page on wikipedia. You should change your mind about it before we find different ways to get our word out to the masses.

A Complaint
Hi, Joyous!. I have a complaint about the userpage of VolatileChemical: he has a counterfeit "You have new messages template." I think that this is inappropriate and inconsiderate, as it makes people who visit his page believe they actually have a new message on their talk page, when in fact they don't. What do you think should be done, if anything? Thanks! -- P.B. Pilhet 20:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Oh, well, I didn't really think that there would be a way to stop it. Thanks anyway, though. -- P.B. Pilhet 03:00, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Re:I saw your comment at LJ
THANK YOU! I keep getting the run around and this will definitely help me get my first article published! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Runendlessly (talk • contribs)

A Question About Signatures
Hi, Joyous!. How do you get your signature to have extra links in it, like to your talk page and contributions? I've tried different ways, but it won't work. I either get no links at all, or the whole thing just links to my userpage. Help! -- P.B. Pilhet 20:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!!! -- P.B. Pilhet (Talk to me here) 20:23, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

I really am a wet blanket...
And to think, I'm such a friendly guy in real life! I get to play country music on a 50,000-watt FM radio station for five hours a day and have a ball being everyone's friend. Ah, but put me on Wikipedia and I become a martinet. Mwaahaahaaaa!!! The decidedly bipolar Lucky 6.9 01:42, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

User talk:24.77.216.252
Ha!, what a nice response from the IP. :) Teke ( talk ) 03:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * It was reverted, but is here. Teke ( talk ) 03:29, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Thousand Island Park
Your recent edit to Thousand Island Park (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 22:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Question
Hi, Joyous, it's P.B. Pilhet again. I have a question for you. I'm interested in becoming a sysop here, but I'm not sure if I'm ready. I've had some experience with Wikipedia for over a year, mostly editing every few months or so. Since early August (when I took the name P.B. Pilhet) I've been editing seriously (I now have close to 600 edits since then) and have been really involved in Newpage Patrolling. I'm also very familiar with Wikipedia's policies that are required knowledge for sysops. When do you think I should try for adminship, and what do you think I need to work on? Thanks! -- P.B. Pilhet (Talk to me here) 19:23, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Spoofhound
Hi Joyous. Thanks for knocking off the afd template placed by Irishguy. While I'm extremely annoyed that it was placed on there I'm not sure if you can unilaterally remove it (although I don't think Irishguy followed the proper procedure in placing it). I have made comments about why I think it should stay -- there are lists of unusual mascots and Spoofhound is always on those lists. Spoofhound is in the early stage of notability. Perhaps there should be a List of unusual school masocts or a category High School mascots. Interest in the mascot is usually higher than the school itself. There's almost always an interesting story associated with an offbeat mascot. Go Zizzers! Go Kewpies! Go Bonackers! Americasroof 03:50, 19 October 2006 (UTC)


 * P.S. I see that you placed the afd (I thought it was Irish guy). So since you removed it right away I'm not sure about the wiki etiquette.  Americasroof 03:56, 19 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I am going to ask you to please modify your comments on Articles for deletion/Spoofhound. I spent several hours compiling List of unique high school mascots sorted by state from the two available sources to show its notability.  That article is now in the process of being cleaned up and the Spoofhound is a unique component.  You can see from user contributions that I'm a subsantial contributor to Wikipedia and so don't take this lightly.  This nomination was made by a rival of the school with a personal vendetta.  Thanks.  Americasroof 02:12, 26 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I respect your opinion although I disagree. Is List of unique high school mascots sorted by state notable?  Would Spoofhound be considered part of that article?  Local high school mascots are a fun and unique aspect that define small (and not small towns).  Americasroof 02:28, 26 October 2006 (UTC)


 * While I of course disagree with your position on removing/redirecting the Spoofhound, I do appreciate your various defenses of the new Maryville High School (Missouri) (and earlier vandalism). It does restore some semblance of my respect for the Wikipedia process which was pretty shell shocked in the last few weeks.  Americasroof 03:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Tiananmen Square reversions
Hi, just a quick note. When you revert, can you please check earlier edits as well? It's just that when you reverted, you did it to a highly POV version which some troll has been repeatedly pushing. If you could bear that in mind if you come back to the page that would help us keep the more neutral version up. Thanks, John Smith&#39;s 09:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Duncan Ball
I didn't realise that Duncan Ball had been vandalised but I can assure you that Duncan Ball DOES live on John St. and Clair St. (corner).

Duncan Ball
As you might know, Duncan tours Australia & other countries giving talks about his books. He said he uses John St. Clair for (I think) adult themed books.

Go Futurama! Sp3000 03:38, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Square (slang)
What can I do about an IP address that keeps adding some stupid POV comment to the above-mentioned article? I'm getting a little tired of the revert battle. Wahkeenah 11:14, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you! The next time I have to revert it, should I say anything about having "turned him in"? Or would that just encourage him? Wahkeenah 13:33, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

He Stopped Loving Her Today
+ == Mistaken comment== Have you seen the comments on the Talk:He Stopped Loving Her Today page? The guy who put in the link seems pretty reasonable to me -- and if you check his contributions, he apparently did NOT link this blog to more than one site. So, unless you have further reasons, which I hope you will add to the discussion, I think this link ought to be reestablished. Hayford Peirce 16:38, 2 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the opportunity to plead my case. I will not restate my entire argument from the other discussion link, but I did want to apologize again, and assure you that I am not a spammer, and I am now more aware of how the process works, and I will be scrupulous in my dedication to following the proper protocol.  Thanks again for the consideration.  Acruset 21:53, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Aaron4433
That user's purpose seems to be solely vandalism. He's inserting a to-be-deleted article on a fictitious ballplayer named Matt Hammie into articles about the Cubs and Sox and who knows what else. I'm guessing he needs a permanent block. Thank you! Wahkeenah 03:39, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I see he has been messing with several articles, doing similar random stuff, which unfortunately was not always caught. He also invented another fake name, not yet marked for deltion like Matt Hammie is. This one is called Ryan Sweeney. I don't know how to propose it for deletion. Wahkeenah 04:00, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * You're right, Sweeney exists. I modified the page from garble to a stub. Wahkeenah 04:20, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I did not take your comments as rude, towards either me or that vandal. If anything, you're too polite. :) Wahkeenah 13:32, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

A little help
Hi! I see you agreed with my opinion on the Flying zombo article. The article's creator has since removed the templates from the article, as well as on another article, Turkey Bowl. There has been a small discussion on the talk pages of both articles, which are currently ongoing. I still feel that the articles are not notable enough for inclusion. Could I perhaps have a second opinion on the talk pages, and perhaps help with whatever the next step may be, from someone who is presumably far more experienced at the whole deletion process than myself? (The Flying zombo article was my first ever prod, AfD or anything of the sort). Thanks in advance. --Dreaded Walrus 03:48, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, and if you reply to this comment, please do so on your page if possible, it makes things easier to follow, and I have you on my watchlist now. Thanks. --Dreaded Walrus 03:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Hey Walrus! I think you're doing a great job of explaining the problem, and staying civil about it, which is something that many experienced editors have a hard time with. If the author of the articles agrees that they should be removed (as I think I'm seeing), you can tag them with, and they'll be removed shortly. If he still wants to contest the deletion, you can place AfD tags on them. Joyous! | Talk 04:06, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes! :) I noticed that it was during my typing out of the second message on this page that he seems to have posted on Talk:Flying Zombo in a way that indicates he may well agree. We'll see how it plays out from here, I think. As for staying civil, yes, I too agree that all too often people may bite the newcomers, but I just see it like this: I was once a newcomer, and when I didn't understand something, people explained it to me. His edits weren't exactly malicious or anything like that, and he has been polite, and not done any personal attacks or anything, so why not welcome him to the community, you know?
 * Thanks for the response and the guidance anyway. :)--Dreaded Walrus 04:10, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

YouTube
GOOD JOB! :) Your going to make my list irrelevant & out-of-date soon!  ---J.S (t|c) 01:14, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * FYI: I started a mini project... ---J.S (t|c) 08:22, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi Joyous
I am new to Wikipedia and thought it would be a way to get people interested in my funny short videos blog by adding a page.

I believe you deleted this content :

Funny Short Videos
For personally hand picked, clean Funny Short Videos that the whole family can enjoy, you have to check out Funny Short Videos. Sign Up for free so you know when a new one is posted.

Just a few of the funny videos you can view:
 * A rabbit, a hamster and a mouse
 * A Paramount Picture, Naughty But Mice
 * Long Haired Hare - Warner Bros
 * Poor Old Bear
 * Crazy Frog - Knight Rider
 * T-rex On A Trampoline. Funny Animation
 * Hippo and a Dog - Out West
 * Caveman out on his own
 * For the birds
 * The Fun Of Hang Gliding

Visit now to see Funny Short Videos

-- ... and was wondering where it says in the terms not to advertise a website? Can you point me in the right direction so that I know what I can and can't do please.

Kind regards, Ian

Missmoonraker's comments
Hi there why did you delete my article on Miss Wales, are you actually aware of whom is a celebrity and who is not in Wales if not why did you delete it, I took a lot of time to research that article.
 * (moved from the top of the page ---J.S (t|c) 20:54, 8 November 2006 (UTC))

Shepard Smith
I have gotten into a minor revert war over the use of "payoff" vs. "settlement", of all things. The other user has reverted for the fourth time in a short period, but that's not really my complaint, it's that he is using some writer's sarcastic or smear quote to push a point of view, and is justifying it on the grounds that the cited article uses that expression, and innocently claiming that the two words mean the same thing. As a native speaker of English, I know full well that they don't: "settlement" is neutral and vaguely legalistic; "payoff" is colloquial and often negative, especially in this context. Maybe I'm wrong on this, but I don't think so. I wonder if you would mind weighing in. I'm sorry to keep pestering you with these petty issues all the time. Wahkeenah 00:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Provisible
When you removed the PROD tag from this article, were you contesting the proposed removal? Joyous! | Talk 03:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC)


 * No - not at all! I dab'd it with a speedy delete tag as part of the new pages patrol, and the originaor of the article removed the tag. Rgds, - Trident13 09:51, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Improper image
Please don't add that image to the article Pimp again. It isn't appropriate. Joyous! | Talk 23:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * How is it an Improper Image exactly? I'm sorry, but I'm going to add it to the page again. Please don't hesitate to contact me again to sort it out however, so we can try and resolve any dispute--Boris Allen 00:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Deleting My Page
Are you saying that my page is less relevant than this page? That just doesn't make any sense to me at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theichibun (talk • contribs)


 * Actually, I don't think either page is relevant. I just happened to run across the new one. I'm nominating both of them for deletion. You are welcome to contribute to either discussion at the pages linked from each article. Joyous! | Talk 19:44, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Texas State Fair Ferris Wheel Accident
Deleted my previous message. Thanks for your comment on my page. I haven't dealt with many nice people here, so your comments were much appreciated. Sorry for the confusion. Good luck on your research! Jyroberson 04:17, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Caitlin Sweet
Hi. Thanks for reviewing the Caitlin Sweet article for speedy deletion. However, I am not sure how you came to the conclusion that it asserts its significance. Does 2 novels make an author significant? Did she win any awards? - Cybergoth 22:46, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Userpage reverting
You are very welcome. Best, Gwernol 00:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Warning tags?
Hi Joyous!,

I have noticed some reverts back to my previous edits which you have accomplished (for example related to Bob and Tom Show) and I wanted to thank you. I trailed back to the User's Talk page and noticed your comments and was impressed. I'd like to be able to place such a message which actually includes the article name, as I notice that there is some code which implies that that is possible within your remark.

I have decided to tend the Bob and Tom Show and related articles because their wide syndication attracts a lot of "fun" edits, many of which are incorrect or inappropriate. But, I'd really like to be able to send a message to the other editors to help them rather than just reverting the changes.

Is there a way to do this in a "semi-automated" manner (a tag, for example)? Could you point me to a list of such messages?

Thanks very much in advance for your support.

Lmcelhiney 14:18, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Fantabulous
This is your last warning. The next time you close off open debate in regards to a valid page, you will be recognized as a Nazi.

I find it rather arrogant that you should threaten to ban a user over an NPOV (non?)issue. If you feel as though you are justified in deleting well-written, well-formated articles because they don't reflect your individual pespective, it would seem that you yourself are the one that needs to consider what is in the best interests of Wikipedia.

If you want to resolve a POV dispute (over a caption, of all things!), have the decency to argue the point in a civil manner, rather than threatening new members.

142.157.200.210 03:26, 28 November 2006 (UTC)


 * That is the most ridiculous statement I've seen in a while here. You know perfectly well that the revisions had nothing to do with NPOV, and everything to do with copying the Richard Simmons article and changing a few words. Joyous! | Talk 11:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Please, if you want to engage in reasonable discussion, please do so when you are not high on meth. Extend me the courtesy of making some sense.  142.157.200.200 17:33, 28 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment. It looks like an address from the IP pool of one of McGill University's residences.  If the silly namecalling and vandalism persist (and you find them annoying, Joy) then I'd suggest a short range block of IP edits from 142.157.200.0/24.  Cheers. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 18:56, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Xing95
Whoever this new user is, its sole purpose, apparently, is to vandalize. Just a couple of articles so far: National Association of Professional Base Ball Players and Carnivora. Wahkeenah 18:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Maintenance tags
Hi, best not to subst: things like "unreferenced" "importance" "Wikify" "cleanup". See WP:SUBST for more info. Rich Farmbrough, 19:24 3 December 2006 (GMT).
 * Thanks for the reminder. My mind knows that, but my fingers typed it without telling me. :-)  Joyous! | Talk 20:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: physics
Joyous, Thanks for the watchful eye. I was just following what seemed to be the protocol (see Talk:Physics/wip). Do you think we should move these somewhere else? —BryanD 00:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: Brian Zoubek
Joyous, my apologies. I had to step away before fleshing out the article and didn't wish to leave it in 'edit' mode. I've since added additional content per your request and responded on the subject talk page. Pepto gecko 03:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

User:Ericanderson
Congratz on pwning his ass. We don't need trashy vandals like him around. Thank you :) | | | | | | E. Sn0 = 31337 = Talk to me :D 04:03, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Your comments on User talk:Fan-1967
Thanks, you made me do a spit-take all over my keyboard. :P —  Brother Flounder  (aka DiegoTehMexican) 01:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

9/11 Mysteries
Just saw 9/11 Mysteries as a new article. It was deleted before though it looks like the previous one was a deleted redirect. I'm not sure about this new one though. AfD? Prod? Good article? -WarthogDemon 04:42, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

User:Nameisbc88
Another vandal to report -, as its only apparent purpose is to add obscenity to articles, such as Oprah Winfrey, Dr. Phil (TV show). Thank you. :) Wahkeenah 00:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Never mind, someone else took care of it. :) Wahkeenah 00:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

John Gorenfeld
Hi Joyous! I put the article on John back. I tried to put some more information and a link to a NPR interview of him to better establish his notablity. Steve Dufour 18:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to The Cay (novel)
Thank you for removing the racist bit that 165.138.40.200 had put it in back @ 1653 on 11 Dec. I feel silly that I did all those edits and didn't see what was there all along. And I misread the change by 24.2.198.254 who had actually cleaned it up and reverted it. D'oh! Thanks and I'll pay closer attention. --EarthPerson 21:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

"You're certainly welcome. I could tell you didn't add the comment, but a rollback was the fastest way to get rid of it. I've accidentally done similar things a number of times. Joyous! | Talk 03:08, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

A "Lego" vandal.
Could you do something about this guy? He's making no attempt to hide the fact that he intends to vandalize, so at least he's honest: Wahkeenah 16:56, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I think User:BrianSmithson is on it. Wahkeenah 02:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: "Uncyclopedian" Article
I agree that the article Uncyclopedian is pretty infactual, and could use a lot of cleanup and revision, but I also think that there does deserve to be a separate article. I'm going to bring the article back, but to avoid an edit war over something such a small issue, I think it would be great if we talked about it a little more on the article's talk page. --Kevin (TALK) 21:32, 29 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Responded --Kevin (TALK) 21:50, 29 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks to you too. Always got to treat others how you want to be treated, right? --Kevin (TALK) 22:16, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

WelcomeBot
I noticed you welcome noobs. I am doing research in prep for the welcomebot trail in order to establish some facts on new user trends. Please can you have a look at Category:WelcomeBotResearch. I would appreciate your involvement. Also so as to assist, please can you sub your welcome template with welcome123 which includes that category. Thanks. frummer 02:22, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * thanks for using it! see also... Category:WelcomeBotResearch. ta! frummer 05:09, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

re: Carter Cooper redirect
Thanks Joyous -- I was looking all through the help pages for the correct form for a redirect and couldn't find it/ ran out of patience looking. I appreciate the help and have fixed the page. Now if I can just figure out citations (it is proper form to use a list of references when quoting from an offsite article or will an external link to the article suffice?) But that's a project for another day. (And fingers crossed that I've got this note in the right place. If not at least I can rest assured that things in the wrong places get deleted quickly :) Claire loon 04:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

A little help to a novice admin
Hi Joyous, Can you check to see if my warning here was done correctly? This is the first time delved into that side of being an admin and just wanted some confirmation that it was OK. More specifically I didn't understand what "" meant. Also should I have subst that template? Thanks, --Fir0002 05:01, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Mark Arey
Hello, Someone keeps recreating Mark Arey and Mark Arey, MD even though you speedy deleted it twice. Would you mind locking it so whoever is doing this can't continue? Thanks, Tlim7882 04:21, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

onions
I have noticed that you deleted the onions page 2 times now, even though I, and other people gathered together notable referances, proving that this band is not some teen rock band playing out of their garage, it is a legitimate band with real songs and real recordings. i would appreciate it if you could allow the page to stay up uncontested from now on thank you

request for speedy deletion Ada da

 * This Spanish article is part racist rant, part nonsense. Could you delete it please? :) JuJube 01:15, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Mark Strand
Hi, I report another vandalization of the Mark Strand article again from User_talk:209.215.186.21. Best regards by Snowolf (talk) on 16:01, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

it wasnt a test, it was real vandalism
yeh.. --ItInvolvesBestBeefSir 17:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

i didnt do squat
--ItInvolvesBestBeefSir 18:26, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Joseph D. Clements
I highly recommend that the article Joseph D. Clements be speedily deleted. I think he is a high school student and I know his parents being from La Crosse, Wisconsin. Thank you-RFD 16:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Correction-he was a high school student.RFD 16:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for doing the speedy deletion of the article. RFD 15:46, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

re: Bees and myths
Good evening, Joy. Good to hear from you again.

The "myths" section of the Bee article predated the addition of the comment about "bees knees" and has been problematic for other reasons. I glanced at the Aploximodoais article but gave it the benefit of doubt at the time. Now that you mention it, though, I'll try to do some digging to see if that term can be verified or if this was a particularly subtle hoax. It's not in my Webster's Ninth dictionary - but that's not yet definitive. Let's see what turns up. Thanks. Rossami (talk) 05:57, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Sean O'Brien The Greatest
Re Sean O'Brien The Greatest, the attack page that you just deleted: I think I recall that the same page, or one with a similar name, was deleted for the same reason (attack) just recently. You might want to check the logs and possibly protect the page if that is the case. I am not an admin or I would do it myself. &#9679;DanMS 05:37, 21 January 2007 (UTC)