User:Jpark111/Ashford Calvin/Chengbatian Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ashford Calvin's article which is writing by Jpark111.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jpark111/Ashford_Calvin?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The content added is relevant to the topic. It is added about career. It’s followed by Wikipedia's guidelines. It does not address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics. The content added is neutral. There are not any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position. It does not have viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented. It does not add an attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another. All new content is backed up by a reliable secondary source of information. The content accurately reflects what the cited sources say. Compared to the current draft, sources are current. Sources were written by a diverse spectrum of authors. It is hard for me to tell if there are better sources available, but I think the sources that have been picked are good sources. Some sources are books, some of them are websites. I worked. The content added is well-written it is easy to read. I don’t see any writing problems. You have been added so much in this page, it is amazing. It may some problems about your Image, hope your can fix it soon.