User:Jpaul082/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title: Adjuvant Therapy
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic and discusses the history/origin of this therapy, how this therapy is used in cancer treatments, and controversy that surrounds this therapy.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * This article appears to be written in a neutral tone and does not try to sway the audience in any particular direction.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Citations/references are used throughout the article to back up the claim made by the author.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * The citations appear to be reliable, coming from reputable sources and being published not too long ago. The links work as well.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * In the Talk section, a name change was suggested as well as expanding upon/ updating certain sections of the article
 * In the Talk section, a name change was suggested as well as expanding upon/ updating certain sections of the article


 * Sources
 * https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/cancer/in-depth/adjuvant-therapy/art-20046687
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1071360/

Option 2

 * Article title: Axillary dissection
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic, however it is lacking a lot of information pertaining to the topic.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * This article is neutral, it only states one fact about the topic. There is no persuasive wording used.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * A citation is used for the one sentence that makes up this article.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * This citation does appear to be reliable, however this topic requires more content and therefore more citations.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * No Wikipedians have made any contributions/suggestions in the Talk page.
 * No Wikipedians have made any contributions/suggestions in the Talk page.


 * Sources
 * https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1894763-overview
 * https://www.breastcancer.org/treatment/surgery/lymph_node_removal/axillary_dissection

Option 3

 * Article title: Tumors of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic and discusses the diagnosis, classification, and treatment of these tumors.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * This article is neutral and only presents facts relating to this topic.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Citations are used to back up the claims made in this article.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * These citations do appear to be reliable sources and are published in recent years. The links do work.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * The Wikipedians on this Talk page have made comments on how this tumor/cancer should be classified.
 * The Wikipedians on this Talk page have made comments on how this tumor/cancer should be classified.


 * Sources
 * https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123852458000200
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9562/

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources