User:Jpeashoes/Orans/Todd Andrea Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jpeashoes


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jpeashoes/Orans?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Orans

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * It doesn't seem as though the lead has been updated, but it is very informative so I almost wouldn't touch it.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * The intro. sentence explains what an Oran is well!
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * The lead does a good job explaining explaining a brief history of what Orans are, which the article also delved into! I would add a bit about their depictions in art to connect that piece, as well!
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * I am not seeing any!
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * I feel the Lead is concise and provides an appropriate amount of detail! I would update the paragraph to include art depiction!

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, it is relevant! :)
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * I am not seeing any content missing, to my knowledge.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * No, I do not believe this article addresses any equity gap.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Yes.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes, the content is backed by their sources.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
 * Yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes, I feel these sources accurately reflect the topic.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes!
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * The sources come from a diverse spectrum of authors.
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
 * I believe the selected sources do a good job representing the material.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * The links I clicked work!

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes! :)
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * I am not seeing any grammatical or spelling errors!
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, the content is well-organized.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Absolutely.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * I would say these photos are captioned well to describe what the figure is doing, but I would add descriptions of color, background, etc. if possible!
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Yes, I believe so!
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Yes!

For New Articles Only
* I don't believe this is a new article

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes! The added content provides context to help the audience further understand the presence (or lack thereof) of female leadership in the church during this time.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * The added content is very clear and provides important information. It is also cited correctly!
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * I wouldn't change anything!

'**Great job! :))'