User:Jpena295/Evaluate an Article

Within the article there is relevancy and nothing is distracting me. I don't think this is out of date, but could definitely use more information. The history behind the science could be explained more, or more information on the science description in general. The article is neutral and has no bias. The links for the citations work, some are in another language which doesn't suit the audience if they don't understand the language, in which it serves no purpose. Within the talk, the last comment was made in 2013 commenting about why it this a relation to math, why there's a source that relates to math when this is a science question.