User:Jpow05/Adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder/Tltuggle18 Peer Review

General info
(provide username) Jpow05
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Jpow05/Adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder - Wikipedia:

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead is pretty good I think towards the end where it says " The cutoff age of 12 is a change from the previous requirement of symptom onset, which was before the age of 7 in the DSM-IV. This was done to add flexibility in the diagnosis of adults." is unnecessary in the lead section. It may do better in the classification section because it's more of a classification/criterion.

In the sixth paragraph where it says "As problems accumulate, a negative self-view becomes established and a vicious circle of failure is set up. Up to 80% of adults may have some form of psychiatric comorbidity, such as depression or anxiety. Many with ADHD also have associated learning disabilities, such as dyslexia, which contributes to their difficulties." I think this should be moved to the treatment section because it shows how concerning ADHD can be. This could be rephrased in your own words on how important it is to recognize these signs are receive treatment.

A good thing I noticed about your sources that are present already is that most of them are less than ten years old and several sources are between 2019-2023. Everything looks good in the sources section.

There's hardly any images or pictures that show brain scans or founding fathers in adult ADHD. So, I think it would be great to incorporate that in your article!

You still have a lot to work on your article but what you've done so far is good! I would suggest working on it more because you have a lot of sections in your article to work on.