User:Jrc162534/sandbox

"History of Food":

What the article has: The article has a decent amount of information, more than you would think a stub article would have, but I think it's because it's a part of history that's been largely overlooked until recently. So while it does have information, there's a lot more information that needs to be added. So far it has information on food from the middle-ages to the 20th century, important staple foods like potatoes and rice, and then some further reading links below the resources section.

What I could add: I think there's a lot that I could add to this article because there's so much information that isn't there yet. I can't think of anything off the top of my head but it definitely has the potential to be one of those super long articles.

My questions: My main question for this article is what parts of food history are missing from the article, and of those parts, which ones are the most important and should be prioritized? I'm also wondering how much I should work with connecting how food through time has impacted the culture, society, history, economy, etc. of different places, or if I should work more on just getting in more black and white, clear information?

My research: place holder"West Francia":

What the article has: This article is also a little longer than I would expect a stub article to be, but it's definitely missing a lot of information for an article that covers a whole region for about 150 years. It briefly goes over how West Francia was created and then every other section after that is just listing Kings and a brief overview of their reign.

What I could add: I feel like there is a lot missing from this article, but 'm not sure how much information I could really add to it because it's from a really old time period which would require me to dig a lot harder to find information since the older the time period, the less records were kept. Plus older records are also less reliable oftentimes which would make it even harder to find information because I would probably have to cross reference different sources to confirm the facts.

My questions: My main question for this article is how much information could I realistically add without spending all of my time researching and confirming information? What's missing that I can add without being an expert in the field?

My research: place holder

"Rise of nationalism in Europe" (I copied the title exactly, this article clearly needs help if even the title is not right):

What the article has: This article has an introduction that seems pretty big compared to what the rest of the article has. It's definitely missing a lot of information for a topic that's as broad as this one. It has information on some of the more black and white parts of nationalism like the revolutions that happened but it really does seem too skinny.

What I could add: I feel like there's definitely a lot I could add here. I feel like a topic like this has a lot of potential. Plus I took AP European History last year and we talked about this exact topic so I already have some background knowledge and resources for it.

My questions: My questions are mostly just whether this would be too hard to add to because a lot of the black and white information is already taken? Also I wonder if it might be too broad of a topic because I don't want to bite off more than I can chew.

My research: place holder