User:Jrenn213/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) Women in medicine

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it talks about women in medicine and how it started and how it is today. It matters because a woman's role in medicine has changed a lot since the medieval time period. My first impression of it was that it has a lot of the information in it that we learned in class.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section is pretty good but it could be a little bit longer I think. It sets up the rest of the article good though. There is a lot of good content throughout the article. the sections are big and pretty detailed. I feel like it is written pretty neutrally because it really is just stating the facts and what happened in the past not really giving an opinion on any of it. There are a lot of citations and sources throughout the article. I think it is written and organized pretty well. each time period is sectioned off into its on part which helps you to know what time is being talked about. There are a few images in it of like the people who are being talked about which is nice to see and they have captions. I mainly saw comments talking about things that could get added to the article about layout issues or different women in medicine to add to the article. The article is rated B class. The article has high importance status and I personally think it is a really good and informative article that could probably use a little more information to it but it overall gets the point across and does a good job of explaining things.