User:Jrpaul7/Evaluate an Article


 * Name of article: Saveria Campo
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * Professor Campo discovered an important vaccination that is still being used today to prevent against certain infections and cancers.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes, a brief introduction is given that combines a small amount of information to each of the following sections.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Mostly no, but small details stand out that are not relevant enough to bear mentioning.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * It is concise, but sometimes too general

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * No, the page was edited a few years ago
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Yes, only facts and information regarding translocation are provided
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes, there are no primary sources.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes, more info could be provided on the subject however
 * Are the sources current?
 * No
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * No

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes, the information flows smoothly
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes. The article has only pertinent sections about the scientist at hand.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * No
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * N/A

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There will be proper citations and links that work now.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * No
 * Lower Level article
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * This article puts into perspective how similar animal and human cell receptors interact with HPV

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * Informative article
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * There is a detailed list of accomplishments and awards
 * How can the article be improved?
 * More information can be provided on Campo's previous life and specific contributions
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * Underdeveloped, it needs a lot more information to stay relevant