User:Jrumscheidt/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Mandy Moore (choreographer)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose the article as I was looking at the Dance Wikiproject and found this article, and Mandy Moore is one of my favourite choreographs. It's relevant to me to learn what other projects she's worked on besides those known to me and to learn more about her background as a dancer and as a choreographer.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.) The lead of the article is fairly concise, beginning with an introduction into who the article is about, what she is known for and her major accomplishments, all of which are the major sections in the article without going to in depth. The content itself is relatively up to date, listed Moore's work up until 2020 but covering her work up until then concisely, dividing it up into sections that are each easy to read and highlight all the important information of the section. The article is very neutral its it tone, only discussing Moore's credentials and awards without giving opinions of for example, her choreography style. The article is well sources with relevant primary sources, however many are not backed up by reliable secondary sources due to the nature of the sources themselves (ie video clips of performances, interviews with Mandy by non-biased Dance magazines, News reports etc) and the links to the sources all work. Overall, the article is well-laid, easy to read, and informative, but could be improved by including more images of Mandy herself and of her work to give more context to readers. Additionally, there are few conversations on the article's talk page itself, but it is of interest to several Wikiprojects including; WikiProject Dance, Wikiproject Women, Wikiproject Biography /Arts and Entertainment etc.