User:Jsmartzz/Thick finger coral/ReZappert124 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jsmartzz


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jsmartzz/Thick_finger_coral?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article:
 * Thick finger coral

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!

I'm going to try and condense my article and not worry so much about the length but rather the specific species information I can find from a source.
 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you?
 * 3) * I think that the information that you have for the article is great and gives a great description on the environment of the Thick finger coral as well as more detailed information about the species.
 * 4) Check the main points of the article:
 * 5) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family)
 * 6) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate?
 * 7) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved?
 * 8) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience)
 * 9) * For the whole article you only stuck to the species you are covering which is great, I feel that the article could be organized a little better, however all the information is correct its just that you need to organize it better. The writing style is great and the language of the article is appropriate.  I will work on finding a better structure and organizing my subsections in a better way such as combining some and providing a better outline. 
 * 10) Check the sources:
 * 11) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number?
 * 12) * Is there a reference list at the bottom?
 * 13) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number?
 * 14) * What is the quality of the sources?
 * 15) * The sources are all good quality, and there is a reference list included at the bottom of the article. The are numbers by each source.  I need to find better and more specific sources regarding my specific species. It's been difficult finding information that cites my specific species. 
 * 16) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 17) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article?
 * 18) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready?
 * 19) * What can be done to improve that article is to improve the organization, I think that it is important to have a source after every sentence. Other than that however I feel that the article is good and ready to be posted. I will ensure that I have a source for each sentence/bit of information and I will also improve on my articles overall organization.
 * 20) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? As mentioned the most important thing is to have a source after every sentence. I will ensure that I have a source after every sentence.
 * 21) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? One thing that I noticed I could do better on my article after reviewing this one also to organize it a little better as mine is organized in a similar way.

'' Very helpful information, thank you! ''