User:Jsoubre2677/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
In-joke

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have in-jokes with my wife, I like humor, and the in-joke article seems interesting.

Evaluate the article
The article clearly states the definition of an in-joke, its synonyms, and links to term used in the opening statement like 'joke,' 'esoteric,' and 'callback.' The article then context for in-jokes and an example. Then, the article goes in to a brief explanation on the philosophy of the in-joke. The article appears to be written factually and does not condemn or condone the use of in-jokes among the various groups or people that implement them among their peers/friends. There are also links to related articles about in-jokes like cultural appropriation and military humor. The sources listed are credible and expand upon the article, and the quality of the writing seems clear, concise, and easy to understand. The article has been rated as stub-class on Wikipedia and as Mid-importance on the importance scale, which seems accurate to me. The talk page is filled with jokesters but also links to other articles and resources for learning more about in-jokes. The Talk page was very informative for those seeking to dive deeper into this article. Overall, I think the article is fine, short, and to the point. Taking some of the references and links from the Talk page would be beneficial to those visiting this page to have a few more options and resources at their disposal.