User:Jsullivan3290/sandbox

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collier_Young

The strengths from this Wikipedia article:

- Neutral coverage seems to be written without bias toward a particular point of view.

- There is a clear, easy-to-understand lead section at the start of the article.

'The weaknesses'' from this Wikipedia article: '''

- Reliable sources are not used throughout this article.I would go back and properly find reliable sources in order to improve/ make this article a reliable source.

- There is not a clear structure with several headings, chronological order, themes. There is no images or diagrams. The lack of images and structures make this very hard to understand. I think with a better picture and improved structure this article would be great.

- There is no prominent balanced coverage of many aspects of the subject with important viewpoints from the article. I would add more viewpoints therefore there can be a balanced amount of coverage for the article.

- There is a very short lead which means these article could have been written through staggered contributions. The lead is short, you are able to tell it has been written through staggered contributions.

- There are a lot of relevant sections missing. This article is not fully relevant. I would improve the relevancy in order to give a true article of whom Collier Young was respectively.

- There are no references or citations. Information needs to be cited.

The reason I am editing:

The reason I am editing the Collier Young article is because it needs a lot of improvement. There is good information in the article but the bad outweighs the good. In order for the article to be great, it would need a lot of improvement.