User:Jtaguchi10/Achatinella mustelina/Kyle.Eppert Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jtaguchi10


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Achatinella mustelina - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

A good starting point! I like the organization of the page so far, with the information box complete and pictures that clearly show the organism you are writing about. The obvious feedback for this article are finding some more sources that you can use to expand on what you already have and provide further detailed information in the different areas of emphasis. Your current sources look very reliable and good variety so continue that effort in expanding! The information you do provide is very well written, it is clear you understand what you are writing about based off your source. Lastly, your lead statement is very good. It adheres to an army principle of "bottom line up front" being as short and concise as possible to get after what you are saying.

PEER REVIEW RESPONSE (julia)
Hey Kyle! Wow, thank you so much for the informative feedback! I will for sure take your suggestions and incorporate them into my work as I revise it. I appreciate the time you took to look through my work as well as give me great feedback! Thanks again.