User:Ju5st.ali/Evaluate an Article

Martin Margiela

This article does include a concise and clear overall explanation of Martin Margiela and who he is and how he is relevant. There isn't much on what is to come in the article but there is an overall explanation on what he influenced in the Fashion Industry. It has some information that is opinionated and calling him the most influential designer.

The content is relevant but has lacking information due to never being able to speak and interview the designer. The content is very relevant sticks to showing where he is from but also the ways in how he got into the fashion industry and his many contributions to the industry. There isn't content missing other than physical pictures and visuals of who he is but other than that there is information out there.

In the opening of the article there is a heavily biased statement claiming him as the most influential designer

For the most part there are articles and sources that are on the article are from trusted sources in the fashion industry. They do reflect the amount of information on the topic because Martin Margiela has never taken a formal interview meaning that some of the information can be lost in transition to media sources and there is no way to confirm for sure. We may have reliable sources but the information is what we can not prove since there is no way to confirm from a direct source.

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)