User:Judo112/Archive1/Judo112/

Deletion review for Mishavonna Henson
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Mishavonna Henson. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - August 2009
Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the gray bar. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list. This Newsletter was delivered by Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 17:04, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
warrior 4321  17:03, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
warrior 4321  17:26, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
warrior 4321  18:12, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Article that needs your help
I am really glad you are up for the battle. (It is going to be a battle, for sure!) Do you mind if I tweak your proposal by, for example, fleshing out some of the details and improving the English? This might help it be more persuasive. You can always edit back anything I do. GeometryGirl (talk) 22:13, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes ofcourse be my guest!!--Judo112 (talk) 06:13, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Awesome. GeometryGirl (talk) 14:25, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

BTW, I have also made a proposal recently here. Do you mind giving your opinion? GeometryGirl (talk) 21:55, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles_for_deletion/The_Jetty_Journals
At this AFD, you indicated that the sources listed show notability and that the article should be kept. Would you mind returning to the discussion and explaining your rationale a little more. As far as I can tell, second source is the author's own website, which isn't independent or necessarily reliable. The first is IMDb, and doesn't actually mention The Jetty Journals at all. I'd appreciate a little more detail. AniMate draw  00:14, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Luara Hayrapetyan


The article Luara Hayrapetyan has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * delete as WP:CRYSTAL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oliver Twisted  (Talk)(Stuff) 14:30, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Murder of Huang Na/GA1
Please see Talk:Murder of Huang Na/GA1, specifically with regard to the issue of stability. I am reviewing the article for possible GA quality status and would like to hear your thoughts. Cirt (talk) 04:39, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dropa


The article Dropa has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Subject of article exists only on unreliable sources (such as geocities websites and in Sir John Mandeville's Travels).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 04:29, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Repost of Dropa
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Simonm223 (talk) 20:10, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Multiple !votes in AFD
Although AFD is not a vote, it is customary to provide only one specific keep or delete opinion. Further dicsussion can be prefixed with "comment", and if you change your mind, your previous !vote is stricken through like this. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 14:18, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * i guess not when it is re-listed. then it is a "new discussion".--Judo112 (talk) 14:19, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Even when it is relisted, it's only one !vote with subsequent comments not having a keep or delete opinion prefixed. -- Whpq (talk) 14:34, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Sorry
Now I see that someone changed it to Death of ... then back to Annie Le...then I changed it and you changed it. If I knew it was changing so much, I wouldn't have done a thing. I just looked at the talk page and thought it was decided. But for now, homocide of... is ok to me. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 22:21, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Dont worry!;) its ok.--Judo112 (talk) 11:06, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

MOS:UNLINKDATES
Please see the above link regarding date linking in articles. Thanks. KV5 ( Talk  •  Phils ) 18:30, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Rederiet tables
My idea was to make everything clear yesterday, but I did not have time to make it clear, therefore, I left it as it was. I had intended to make clear it later, or that someone else could meanwhile continue to fill in the table. It's a fairly time-consuming work. You should have given me more time before you deleted it. It was NOT graffiti, if you think so! /Hollac16 (talk) 08:31, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
I noticed the message you recently left to. Please remember: do not bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Martin 4 5 1  (talk) 21:36, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Straw poll on reliable sources for Eurovision articles
The second RfC on sourcing for Eurovision articles has now being running for several weeks, you can view it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision. In order to help gauge the spread of opinion and draw conclusions from this discussion a straw poll has been started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision. All project members are encouraged to read the RfC thoroughly and then cast their votes as they see fit. Rationales are still encouraged in the main discussion area above the poll, and participants can add appropriate new sources or options to the poll as they wish. Camaron · Christopher · talk 19:04, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

North Epping murders
Hi, seeking support to keep regarding Articles for deletion/North Epping murders. Do you have an opinion on that? Thanks Ajayvius (talk) 10:09, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - July 2009
Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the gray bar. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list. This Newsletter was delivered by Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 23:26, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Subheadings in biographies
Hi. I noticed your edits to Lynette Fromme, which included re-inserting the subheading of "Biography" over a large part of the content. Biographical articles are already biographies and using a subheading called that has been deprecated on Wikipedia because it is redundant and creates unnecessary sectioning. Thought you should know that in case you've made similar changes on articles where it has already been removed. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 20:42, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry. See ya.--Judo112 (talk) 16:14, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

About the warning
I had no information about the decision. Thanks for informing. Good work.--Salomonis (talk) 14:09, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Georgia state 2009 mass murder


The article Georgia state 2009 mass murder has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * One time news event, see NOT.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr. Vernon (talk) 23:58, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - February 2009
Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the gray bar. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list. This Newsletter was delivered by Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 15:47, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD proposal of Lovelock Correctional Center
I have proposed Lovelock Correctional Center, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at the article's page. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at the article's discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --Tomballguy (talk) 20:21, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Chris

Scroll this site down. Rebecka Larzen was first runner up and would indeed have go to Miss Universe, and the Trump Organization said she had all the criteria, but the new delegation in Sweden did not give the approval. http://www.beauland.net/news/2004/04-apr.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.77.162.196 (talk) 21:17, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Perhpas so, but she never was the official Miss Sweden winner. if you find a source to indicate that indeed Rebecka was the official Miss Sweden feel free to add the info back.--Judo112 (talk) 21:40, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Many delegates from the 1970's have never been official winners as well, especially when Året Runt was a low budget magazine. And being a winner was not necessarily a rule to go abroad for beauty pageants, the delegation could pick anyone of the finalists. They were handpicked from the previous year due lack of resources. The format of crowning a winner has never really taken place til it was televised on TV4. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.77.162.196 (talk) 17:14, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - March 2009
Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the gray bar. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list. This Newsletter was delivered by Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 23:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sahar Daftary
I have nominated Sahar Daftary, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Sahar Daftary&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Leave  Sleaves  20:53, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - April 2009
Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the gray bar. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list. This Newsletter was delivered by Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 23:52, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Please fill in the edit summary like wot I have done.
Could you please fill in the edit summary when editing. This helps other editors when looking at edits in their watchlist, and on history pages etc. (Ok I know my summaries are not the best, they are better than nothing) Martin 4 5 1  (talk) 22:04, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure:)--Judo112 (talk) 11:36, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Samantha Orobator
A tag has been placed on Samantha Orobator requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Harry the Dog WOOF 10:57, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Samantha Orobator
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Samantha Orobator, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NOT#NEWS, WP:BIO1E and WP:BLP1E.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Harry the Dog WOOF 11:06, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Samantha Orobator
I have nominated Samantha Orobator, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Samantha Orobator. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Harry the Dog WOOF 11:08, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD proposal of Lovelock Correctional Center (2nd proposal)
I have proposed Lovelock Correctional Center, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at the article's page. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at the article's discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --Tomballguy (talk) 23:09, 9 May 2009 (UTC)Chris


 * Prod removed Martin 4 5 1  (talk) 00:17, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

FAC withdrawn
Sandy Georgia (Talk) 22:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi
I don't know if you'd noticed but I've tried to write a few Jade Ewen articles in other Languages do you speak any other languages/ could you help. thanks 安東尼 TALK 圣诞快乐  18:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi im sorry but i have already made some Jade articles on other wikipedias. but thats it..i dont know any other languages. sorry--Judo112 (talk) 14:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Invitation!
Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 16:23, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Sasha Son
A tag has been placed on Sasha Son requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shnitzled (talk) 13:10, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

People from Bollnäs
Please stop adding this category to articles. The category doesn't exist! Dismas |(talk) 16:00, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Nevermind. I see you finally created it.  Dismas |(talk) 16:00, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks--Judo112 (talk) 16:01, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Jade Ewen
Sorry if my edits were seen as vandalism; I inserted in what I knew from a radio website. I think I won't add it in again now. --Litherlandsand (talk) 09:51, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thats ok. Yes please dont add material without sources,especially claims like that. Have a nice day!--Judo112 (talk) 13:30, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Rolf Roosalu
Sorry about the revert edit, once I realized you were working on it, I tried to revert, but you beat me to it! Cheers. BoomerAB (talk) 17:45, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * its ok:) cheers.--Judo112 (talk) 17:47, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Anastasiya Prykhodko
A tag has been placed on Anastasiya Prykhodko requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Lets drink  Tea  20:44, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Anastasiya Prykhodko
A tag has been placed on Anastasiya Prykhodko requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Lets drink  Tea  20:48, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rolf Roosalu
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rolf Roosalu, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication that the subject meets the guidelines for inclusion.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. § FreeRangeFrog 02:25, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Floortje Smit
I have nominated Floortje Smit, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Floortje Smit. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.  role player 22:20, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi, would you mind if I was to delete your inclusion of a joint Eurovision bid between Palestine and Israel from the 2009 Gaza conflict page? Its not really relevant to the conflict. Superpie (talk) 15:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure.--Judo112 (talk) 16:56, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Christopher Foster (arsonist)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Christopher Foster (arsonist), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. A tag has been placed on Richard Henyard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. De728631 (talk) 18:55, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Ruthann Aron, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Ruthann Aron appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ruthann Aron has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ruthann Aron and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Ruthann Aron with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ruthann Aron.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. 76.64.212.106 (talk) 15:53, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Laila Adéle
A tag has been placed on Laila Adéle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. otherlleft (talk) 15:40, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bobby Woods
I have nominated Bobby Woods, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Bobby Woods. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Elliskev 12:48, 22 October 2008 (UTC) Elliskev 12:48, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Michael Cornell
A tag has been placed on Michael Cornell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 12:50, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mayra Rosales
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mayra Rosales, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. D ARTH P ANDA duel 19:35, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mayra Rosales
I have nominated Mayra Rosales, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Mayra Rosales. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. D ARTH P ANDA duel 19:12, 31 October 2008 (UTC) emplate:PRODWarning --> Crusio (talk) 16:13, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

==[[:

Speedy deletion of "Amandine Bourgeois"
A page you created, Amandine Bourgeois, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. David WS <sub style="color:lime;">(contribs)  18:04, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 'I understand that you tried to get the first edit in 2009. In the future, if you want to play around, use the sandbox.' Terrillja  talk  00:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Based on your recent edits, I suggest that you make constructive edits instead of trying to get "first edits" for 2009 under the guise of making minor edits. Wikipedia is a serious project. Consider this a second warning. Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 00:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Nela Pocisková
Hi Judo112, where do you have the birthdate September 25, 1987 from? All sources I found say 4th of October, 1990, except http://www.esctoday.com/news/read/13778 which says "1987" --androl (talk) 20:45, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * i took that from slovakian wikipedia. but i dont know. maybe you are right!--Judo112 (talk) 20:47, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - May 2009
Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the gray bar. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list. This Newsletter was delivered by Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 02:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

RfC on reliable sources for Eurovision articles
A second RfC has been started on sourcing for Eurovision articles, you can view it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision. This RfC is critical as it will help determine how current and future Eurovision articles are sourced, and as much participation as possible is needed for a consensus to develop. You are being notified as you are listed as an active user of WikiProject Eurovision, and hence the results of this RfC could have a large impact on the articles you edit. Camaron · Christopher · talk 09:16, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - June 2009
Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the gray bar. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list. This Newsletter was delivered by Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 02:38, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

You have been accused of sockpuppetry
Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Judo112 and comment as soon as possible. Thanks. Peter <b style="color:#02b;">Symonds</b> ( talk ) 10:46, 4 July 2009 (UTC)