User:Jules2992/Heritability of autism/Jkb0001 Peer Review

General info
Jules2992
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Heritability of autism
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Heritability of autism

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * I found the twinning risk section to be a distraction.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * It is unclear if they are bias, but a lot of information is outdated and could be made based on bias of the past. A history section could clear this up rather than present it as fact.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * I think that outdated information is overrepresented in the article. There should be a history section to discuss these references rather than present them as up to date.
 * Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * They support the claims, but many are outdated and need updating.
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Some of the sources are so out of date they would not be reliable anymore. Many coming from the 90s and even before. Bias is not noted.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * The other family studies section seems to be out of date and updated to more modern findings.