User:JulesUAB/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Clinical psychology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I'm interested in clinical psychology and thought the article would be beneficial for me to read. The article gives an in depth background on the history of clinical psychology, careers in clinical psychology, the requirements to become a clinical psychologist, and even the main approaches to therapy (humanistic, psychodynamic, cognitive, etc.). In my opinion, the article was informative and provides as a great resource of the profession, while also stating additional knowledge relating to clinical psychology.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article was unbiased and took no particular stance, or had any words that indicated a tone of partiality. The content of the article really went beyond a general knowledge of clinical psychology and included details in the field of psychology as a whole. The format was clear and concise, the sentences were well written and flowed in a way that built upon the topic. Additionally, there were relevant photos added into the article and a table comparing multiple careers in psychology. Throughout the article, there were links and citations to reputable sources. With all this in mind, I would say the article is well developed and a good source of information on clinical psychology.