User:JuliaM99/sandbox

In Australia and the United Kingdom, clinical physiology is not a medical specialty for physicians. Rather, clinical physiologist is a term used in these systems to refer to an allied health professional, scientist, or technologist who may work as a cardiac scientist, vascular scientist, respiratory scientist, sleep scientist or in Ophthalmic and Vision Science as an Ophthalmic Science Practitioner (UK). These professionals also aid in the diagnosis of disease and manage patients, with an emphasis on understanding physiological and pathophysiological pathways. Disciplines within clinical physiology field include audiologists, cardiac physiologists, gastro-intestinal physiologists, neurophysiologists, respiratory physiologists, and sleep physiologists.

History
Clinical physiology was first established in 1954 by the Swedish government with the intention of ensuring "contact between routine clinical work and the scientific progression." Clinical physiology was originally its own discipline, however, in 2008, it was decided that clinical physiology would be categorized as a sub-discipline to radiology. For this reason, those pursuing a career in clinical physiology must first become registered and certified radiologists before becoming clinical physiologists.

copied from clinical physiology

In response to the question of why there is a distinction between ethical, environmental, and dietary vegans: I agree with the already added comment, and would like to point out that by indicating that 'ethical vegans are the only true vegans', the article would become objective and biased, since there is no explicit evidence or definition of what a 'true' vegan is.

Additionally, it is important to distinguish between the various types of veganism to ensure the article is as thorough and informative on the topic as possible.

In regards to improving the article, it might be significant to add arguments made against veganism, as well as the appropriate response to the argument, so that the myth or confusion can be clarified.

At the same time, the arguments should be depicted on this page as well as other wiki pages to do with animal consumption i.e veganism because veganism can be a stricter form of vegetarianism and therefore might have more opposing arguments.

A question I would like to pose and possibly add the answer into the wikipedia page regards why the German Society for Nutrition does not reccomend vegan diets for children, infants, or during pregnancy and breastfeeding. This would be important since it is mentioned right after indicating that Canada, the UK, and the USA all agree on the adequacy of a vegan diet. JuliaM99 (talk) 00:02, 2 February 2018 (UTC)