User:Juliacat728/Climate Change Ethics/Fairfield203Barc Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think that overall the article does an effective job of teaching the audience about climate change ethics. I noticed a typo in the first paragraph: "The two main ethical implications of climate change are related to the its effects." Some vocabulary felt repetitive and I think it could be strengthened through varied word choice. For example in this sentence: "there are disagreements among actors on whether and to what extent society should act on climate change", the use of the world actor/ act sounds repetitive. There are no fundamental issues with the Wikipedia page and I think it is both informative and interesting. I think the page is well organized and covers all elements of the topic. Adding images or media elements could help strengthen this page and make it more visually appealing.