User:Juliacat728/Climate Change Ethics/Vanimal34 Peer Review

Lead

- this is a new article created by my peer

- the lead does reflect the content

- the first sentence gives a definition of the topic (climate change ethics)

- the lead may need to better introduce other sections

- overall good intro

Content

- content is relevant and thorough

- they used relatively current sources

- info up to date especially as climate change ethics is a current hot topic

- mentions underdeveloped countries being affected by climate change so does discuss equity gaps

Tone

- professional tone

- neutral discussion on both sides of climate change

- viewpoints equally represented

- global justice paragraph pushes in favor of stopping climate change at all cost

Sources

- sources seemed reliable and current

- articles on relevant studies

Overall impressions

- very well written

- especially loved the introduction

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Juliacat728)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)