User:Juliaholm/sandbox

I chose an article titled “Ethical Eating,” because this is related to our class and is also an interest of mine. I felt that, while everything presented in the article was relevant, nearly all of the topics presented in the article lacked subsistence. For example, under the heading Seafood, there was only one sentence, which reads, “Industrial fishing has broad effects with ethical consequences.” While this is true, this sentence does not even begin to cover the depth of this topic. This article seemed to be fairly neutral to me, as it presented different viewpoints, including veganism, vegetarianism, and “ethical” meat. However, there were some points when biases were present but not noted. What this article did include is a “criticisms” section as well as an “areas of agreement” section, which added to the article’s credibility. The “further reading” section needs to be expanded on greatly. While we haven’t specifically spoken about this topic in our class, I believe that the article presented enough variation in viewpoints that everyone’s beliefs would feel supported by this article.