User:JulianaL123/Carcinology/Marleec25 Peer Review

General info
JulianaL123
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:JulianaL123/Carcinology
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Carcinology

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article is able to be very clear and informative within just the lead, very informative and straight to the point. There wasn't any fluff or biases that were evident, mostly basic definitions, good introduction to the concept. The one change I would have for the article is adding something like a visual aid for the article body part. For me, it is a little difficult to understand the taxonomic order of these studies. Does it just follow the taxonomic order of the phylogenetic tree that we go over in class or is it something else? The other thing that I noticed and would suggest to try to improve would be that I had trouble accessing the second reference. Other than those two things, I think it is very clear and concise, and you met all of the requirements by adding in the three required references.