User:JulianaRios11/Cross processing/DionnaTaylor Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

JulianaRios11


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Draft
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Current

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hi there! I love film photography so I found your topic to be especially fascinating, looking forward to your final product! Below is my peer review:

Lead

I like how you condensed the lead in comparison to the current version. You made the intro more to the point and gave the reader an over all gist without getting too bogged down in detail! The only suggestion I had would be to maybe consider adding a brief description of cross processing in artistic practice since that's one of your major sections later on.

Content

While I don't know much about this topic, it seems like all the content there is relevant! I like how you included notable works for cinematography. I'd be really interested in hearing more about the history behind cross processing!

Tone and Balance

The tone of this article seems pretty neutral to me! Perhaps expansion on the cross processing in artistic practice section might help balance it out with the processes one!

Sources and References

You've done an amazing job expanding on the references for this article, adding in citations when necessary and appropriate. It looks like there might be some things missing from citations 4 and 5 (?) though I'm not entirely sure what the red coding means. If you're unsure about that too maybe asking Professor Champion?

Organization

The article so far is sorted nicely and flows in a logical way! Keep it up as you expand more.

Overall

I think you're off to a great start with editing this article! You've touched up the logistics and added a section that adds value to this concept. My biggest suggestion would be to just expand! I'd love to read more about cross-processing, especially since I don't know a lot to begin with, and I feel like a lot of others will too :)