User:JulianaRios11/Cross processing/Khascall Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:JulianaRios11


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JulianaRios11/Cross_processing


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Cross processing

Lead
The lead is slimmed down a bit, which makes sense -- I did wonder why you dropped out 'Xpro', and the sentence "The effect was discovered independently by many different photographers often by mistake in the days of C-22 and E-4." I think the sentence might need to be re-added and maybe expanded a bit so that it makes more sense to people who aren't familiar with chemical names in film. I see that you added a sentence to the lead that summarizes your addition of the 'Cross processing in artistic practice' section. That makes sense.

Content
Overall the content is good and has useful details. Once you go live with the article we can add the images back in. I think to meet our goal of moving this article up by a quality class there needs to be a bit more. I wonder if there's more to say about artistic practice or critical response?

Tone and Balance
Tone sounds good. There are a few places where just a bit more detail would be nice -- there are some juicy bits about development labs, about the approach being very 'in' and then falling out of favor, etc.

Sources and References
You did an excellent job adding new references, this was a major weak point with the previous article and now it's looking a lot better. That said, since there's a need to add a bit more content, probably the reference count will increase with that unless the ones you already found can be mined for more details.

Organization
The organization makes sense to me!

Images and Media
The current article has quite a few images and features; I think this is ok, but one way you could boost the quality of this article (without having to dig up more details) would be to add examples of what cross processing looks like when done via a digital filter -- Multiple exposure has this. You could do a photo of your own with a filter, or pick one that is already on Commons and make use of it. I do see some other images up there if you think it makes sense to add more photos to what's there: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Cross_processing and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:C-41_cross_processing.

Overall impressions
Overall this article is strong. It needs more detail to push it over the threshold and reach our 'one quality class' goal.